Published 14 December 2018

From voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting

The Swedish implementation of the EU directive on disclosure of non-financial information covers two thirds of net turnover in the corporate sector and two thirds of the carbon dioxide emissions in the business sector. The Swedish listed companies’ sustainability reports appear more transparent and comparable than in our neighbouring Nordic countries, but there is room for improvement.

In October 2014, an EU directive was adopted that required that certain large undertakings, with more than 500 employees, should prepare an annual non-financial statement containing information relating to environmental matters, social and employee-related matters, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and bribery matters. The aim of the reporting requirement, which applies for the financial year starting on January 2017, is to enhance the transparency and comparability of the non-financial information disclosed throughout the Union.

Sweden implemented the new regulations on 1 December 2016, by means of amendments to the Annual Reports Act (1995:1554). The Swedish reporting requirement applies to all undertakings that

  1. on average have more than 250 employees,
  2. have a net turnover of more than SEK 350 million or a balance sheet total of more than SEK 175 million,
  3. fulfil at least two of the above criteria for turnover, balance sheet total or number of employees.

The Swedish implementation is thus wider than what is required according to the EU minimum level, partly as it covers companies with more than 250 employees on average, which is half the number stated in the directive, and partly as it applies to all companies, and not just traded companies or certain financial institutions.

In this memo, From voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting, Growth Analysis analyses Sweden’s implementation of the EU directive on non-financial reporting. The report forms part of the framework project Can the financial market’s sustainability assessments contribute to the business sector’s green conversion and if so is there a role for the state?

What companies are covered by the reporting requirements?

Using firm-level data and data on production-based emissions at industry level for 2015, we investigate the share of Sweden’s business sector, economy and greenhouse gas emissions covered by the more wide-ranging reporting requirement.

  • With the Swedish size limits, around 1,500 independent companies are covered by the new reporting requirements, which corresponds to about 3 percent of all private corporations. The obligation to report differs widely across industry sectors. The proportion of firms in agriculture that are required to report is around 1 per cent, compared to almost 100 per cent of companies in the mineral industry.
  • In total, about 1.05 million people work in companies covered by the non-financial reporting requirements, which corresponds to 45 per cent of all employees in the private sector.
  • The net turnover of the companies covered by the non-financial reporting requirements amounted to SEK 4,470 billion, which corresponds to two thirds of the total net turnover in the corporate sector.
  • In terms of added value, 62 per cent of value is created by companies that are covered by the non-financial reporting requirements. This share varies over sectors, ranging from almost 100 per cent for the Mining and quarrying sector to 21 per cent for the Other service activities sector.
  • The requirement to disclose non-financial information is estimated to cover 58 per cent of all fixed assets in the Swedish corporate sector.
  • The reporting companies account for 67 per cent of the business sector’s carbon dioxide emissions and 58 per cent of the other greenhouse gases.

Has the sustainability reporting of Swedish companies become more transparent and comparable over time?

Growth Analysis has also investigated the transparency and comparability of Swedish sustainability reporting over the last four years, whereof the last year under directive requirements. We interpret a transparent sustainability report as the quantity of sustainability information that the company disclose. Comparable sustainability reporting is interpreted as the coherence of the sustainability reports, thus whether companies choose to disclose equal sustainability information. Growth Analysis uses the Nordic Compass database, which contains information on ESG indicators for around 400 companies that are traded in the NASDAQ OMX Nordic Large and Mid Cap segment, about 40 per cent of which are companies with their headquarters in Sweden and most of the remaining in the other Nordic countries. Nordic Compass includes 80 ESG indicators, divided into the categories Environmental, Social, and Governance indicators, and covers four years; from 2014 to 2017.

  • The analysis shows that on average the companies report about half of the environmental and social indicators and two thirds of the governance indicator.
  • The Swedish companies report slightly more than the non-Swedish companies, in particular as regards to information on governance.
  • No apparent trends in quantity of information reported can be observed over the period.
  • The ICB sectors Basic Materials, Consumer Goods and Telecommunications report the most sustainability indicators in total, while companies in Healthcare, Technology and Finance report the fewest. While companies in Consumer Services and Technology appear to have reduced the number of reported sustainability indicators over the last four years, the Oil and Gas sector seems to have increased the quantity sustainability information disclosed.

The comparability of the sustainability reports has been investigated by statistical tests of the coherence of the disclosed information across sustainability reports.

  • The level of coherence of Swedish sustainability reports is measured to be halfway between random and perfect agreement.
  • The measure indicates that companies with headquarters in a non-Swedish country display less coherence than Swedish companies.
  • The Swedish sustainability reports appear slightly more coherent over time, while the non-Swedish sustainability reports display a more constant or a marginally negative trend. We see no apparent shift in the reporting trends in relation to the implementation of the new reporting requirements.
  • Over ESG category, clearly the reporting of governance information is most coherent, both across Swedish and non-Swedish firms.

Conclusion

By implementing the EU directive on non-financial reporting broader than the prescribed minimum level, more than half of the Swedish corporate sector is covered in terms of added value and greenhouse gas emissions. Although Swedish firms appear to be reporting, on average, a larger quantity of sustainability information in a more coherent way than our Nordic neighbours, there is room for increased transparency and comparability. In a few years, it will be possible to investigate whether the reporting requirement has these effects.

Title
From voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting

Serial number
PM 2018:22

Reference number
2018/070

Download the report in SwedishPDF